Common Cause Texas
Featured by Common Cause Texas

Part of the Texas Election Protection Coalition’s May 2, 2026 voter education initiative.

Historical Context

How Texas Bond Elections Have Performed

Historical passage rates, comparable elections, and structural factors for all four DFW jurisdictions on the May 2, 2026 ballot.

Methodology

The following data reflects historical Texas bond election outcomes. No prediction of May 2, 2026 results is intended or implied.

What Drives Passage?

Historical data from Texas bond elections reveals several consistent patterns:

  • Proposition category matters. Streets, public safety, and school facilities pass at the highest rates (85–95%). Parks and recreation are moderately strong. Housing and athletic facilities face the most resistance.
  • Bond size relative to tax base. Jurisdictions with strong tax base growth and AAA/AA credit ratings pass bonds at higher rates. Voters are more comfortable when the per-household cost is modest relative to home values.
  • May vs. November timing. May elections consistently produce lower turnout (5–12% in DFW), which historically favors passage because organized supporters are more likely to vote.
  • Track record of delivery. Jurisdictions with visible, successful projects from prior bonds build voter confidence. Conversely, perceived waste or unfulfilled promises suppress passage rates.
  • Campaign dynamics. Organized opposition, even if small, can defeat propositions in low-turnout elections. The presence or absence of active “Vote No” campaigns is a key swing factor.

Historical Passage Rates by YearState Bond Review Board

Historical passage rates by year and category

Passage Rates by Category

Not all proposition types pass at the same rate. Streets and public safety lead; athletic facilities and housing lag.

Streets/Transportation80%+
Public Safety75-85%
School Facilities70-75%
Parks/Recreation65-75%
Affordable Housing50-65%
Athletic Facilities45-55%

Comparable Texas Elections (2022–2025)

Texas city GO bonds passed at an average rate of ~82% from 2022–2025. Grand Prairie's per-capita ask ($1,521) falls below six recently successful comparables. Streets and public safety bonds almost never fail when properly structured.

CityYearBondPer CapitaTax ImpactResult
Grand Prairie TX2026$327M$1,521+3.90¢May 2
Garland TX2025$360M$1,457No increase82.7% Yes
Arlington TX2025$201M$505No increase73.9% Yes
Denton TX2023$291M$1,968+5.76¢~70% Yes
Sugar Land TX2024$350M$2,966+5.0¢Passed
Corpus Christi TX2022/24$175M$554No increasePassed ×2
McKinney TX2024$450M$2,0914 of 5 Yes
Laredo TX2025$417M$1,585~85% No

May 2026 Jurisdiction Historical Context

Dallas ISD

School bonds in Texas pass at 70-75% on average

Structural Factors

  • Largest school bond in TX history creates voter fatigue risk
  • Strong PSF guaranty and low per-household cost
  • 2020 bond accountability gaps may depress turnout

Fort Worth

Fort Worth's 2018 bond passed with strong margins

Structural Factors

  • $0 tax rate increase is strongest selling point
  • Streets and public safety bonds have highest passage rates
  • 177 BalancingAct submissions show community engagement

Grand Prairie

First bond since 2001 — no recent baseline

Structural Factors

  • 25-year bond gap creates institutional trust deficit
  • AAA credit rating is strong fiscal credibility signal
  • Laredo parallel: long gaps breed distrust

Arlington ISD

Arlington city bonds passed at 73.9% in 2025

Structural Factors

  • Low per-household cost ($1.50/month)
  • CNSC community process builds buy-in
  • Phase 5 deferral concerns from 2019 bond